The Instagram Post That Set Off Alarms
James Comey, the former FBI Director, is back in the headlines after a mysterious Instagram post landed him at the center of a federal investigation. The seemingly innocent photo showed seashells spelling out '86 47,' but it didn't take long for users to spot the possible code: '86' meaning to eliminate or remove, and '47' referring to Donald Trump, who is widely expected to be the 47th president if he wins another term.
Before the post was deleted, it spread across social media, igniting speculation and outrage. Comey tried to clarify that there was no violent intent, calling the message a misunderstood expression of his political views. But the damage was done—critics claimed it looked like a veiled threat, while his defenders argued that the reaction was blown out of proportion.
Federal Response and Political Fallout
The controversy ramped up after Donald Trump weighed in. He didn’t mince words, arguing that Comey 'meant assassination' and repeating his old attacks on Comey as a 'dirty cop.' Federal agencies sprang into action, with the FBI and Secret Service launching a joint investigation. FBI Director Kash Patel quickly confirmed that his agency is taking the matter seriously and is in close contact with the Secret Service. The White House also joined the chorus of condemnation, with Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair calling the post troubling, especially since it happened while Trump was traveling abroad—a time when national security concerns are heightened.
The uproar comes at a time when Comey is in the spotlight for other reasons, too. He's currently on a publicity tour for his new novel, FDR Drive, doing interviews and public appearances. For many, this post revived old debates about his time as FBI Director from 2013 to 2017, especially his handling of two of the most contentious investigations in recent memory—the Hillary Clinton emails and the probe into Russia's role in the 2016 election.
Comey's supporters say he's being unfairly targeted, seeing the fierce response as another example of political weaponization. But his critics argue that a former law enforcement chief should know better than to dabble in cryptic social media posts, especially ones that could be interpreted as a coded call for violence against a high-profile political figure.
Those close to the investigation say both law enforcement agencies are looking at the '8647' post from every angle: intent, context, and possible impacts on Trump's safety. No charges have been filed so far, but the situation has stirred fierce debate about the boundaries of political expression, the responsibilities of former officials, and how quickly a cryptic internet message can turn into a full-blown scandal.
Write a comment